- Type:
- Book Chapter
- Author:
- Richard Neels
- Published:
- 2023
Abstract This paper offers a new interpretation of Heraclitus’ use of opposites and how they feature in his explanation of the cosmos. It argues that the so-called “unity of opposites’ thesis does not exhaust Heraclitus’ interest in opposites. It contrasts Heraclitus with his Ionian predecessors, Anaximander and Anaximenes, who treated opposites as fundamental explanantia for the cosmos. Viewed from this perspective, Heraclitus’ opposites appear to be explananda—things to be explained. The paper argues that this analysis of Heraclitus’ use of opposites reveals some features of his theory of explanation. Heraclitus rejects explanatory fundamentality but promotes the idea of a cosmos whose various parts explain its other parts. Opposites are both explananda and (non-fundamental) explanantia along with all the parts of the cosmos. Interestingly, Heraclitus’ cosmos itself appears to be both an explanandum and an explanans.
Get this book
ⓘ These are affiliate links; if you make a purchase, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Sıkça sorulan sorular
- What is "Opposites and Explanations in Heraclitus" about?
- Abstract This paper offers a new interpretation of Heraclitus’ use of opposites and how they feature in his explanation of the cosmos.
- Who wrote "Opposites and Explanations in Heraclitus"?
- Richard Neels