Xiongnu Language: Turkic Connection Debate

200 BCE · Moğolistan · culture

The structure of the Xiongnu language is disputed: there are schools holding that it was Turkic (Pulleyblank, and Vovin in some of his works), a mixture of Yeniseian and Turkic (Mair), or independent (Doerfer).

Similarities in numerals, titles and personal names point to a Turkic root. The proto-forms of chanyu (*šaŋ-ua ~ şanyü), shad and beg are debated but strong.

Related civilizations

Frequently asked questions

What was Xiongnu Language: Turkic Connection Debate?
The structure of the Xiongnu language is disputed: there are schools holding that it was Turkic (Pulleyblank, and Vovin in some of his works), a mixture of Yeniseian and Turkic (Mair), or independent (Doerfer).
When did Xiongnu Language: Turkic Connection Debate happen?
200 BCE
Where did Xiongnu Language: Turkic Connection Debate take place?
Moğolistan